|
Heart Damage: Another Cover-Up?
Rezulin was approved on the fast track in 1997, but links
to at least 56 cases of heart failure and 90 cases of liver
failure ended up sparking a debate over Congress demand
for speedy
reviews of new prescription drugs. Previously undisclosed
documents and interviews showed that Rezulin heart defects
were also a concern from the beginning. Rezulin was FDA approved
in just six months, which did not allow a complete clinical
trial to determine if Rezulin side effects caused heart damage.
Instead, the Echo Study was put together to determine whether
the use of Rezulin for 48 weeks would result in a change in
the left ventricle. A left ventricle change would indicate
heart failure because it can result if it cannot contract
forcefully enough.
|
In the first 18 months of Rezulin
sales
there were 56 side effects reports from FDA records
showing heart failure.
|
Dr. Paresh Dandona, the endocrinologist who served as Warner-Lamberts
principal investigator for the Echo study in Buffalo, said
The Echo Study was not properly conducted, according
to the standard protocol. I was not made aware of the fact
that the patients from this site, in particular, for whatever
reason, whether it was due to technique or whatever, that
they had increased left ventricular mass, (L.A. Times,
3-26-00). Dadona also added that he had delegated a majority
of the work to heart specialists that had deviated from the
Echo Study procedures when studying up to one third of the
Rezulin patients.
As far back as October 18, 1996, concern was raised over
the safety of Rezulin in regards to its potential for adverse
heart side effects. Dr. Robert I. Misbin, an FDA diabetes
specialist, wrote an email to a former FDA medical officer
who had studied Rezulin in the 1990s and recommended
its rejection, Dr. John L. Gueriguian, saying, my primary
concern about Rezulin is related to its potential for cardiac
toxicity, (L.A. Times, 3-26-00). Many diabetes patients,
an estimated 15 million Americans, are overweight and have
a far higher risk of developing congestive heart failure,
which made the issue of the use of Rezulin and its potential
side effects to cause heart problems especially important.
After the FDA approval of Rezulin on January 29, 1997, officials
had negotiated a nonbonding pledge from Warner-Lambert to
start a new study to assess Rezulins side effects on
patients who had preexisting heart disease evidence. Few patients
were enrolled, and this study was never completed. Rezulin
patients did die of heart failure side effects, but doctors
claimed many of these patients had preexisting heart problems.
Guston Turner, a pharmacist from the FDAs scientific
investigations division had found inconsistencies in research
measuring Rezulins side effects on the heart. Turner
felt that the FDA should have delayed approval of Rezulin
until all the questions were addressed, (L.A. Times,
3-26-00).
Serious, life-threatening Rezulin side effects have been
directly linked to the use of the diabetes drug. Warner-Lambert
has been blamed in dozens of deaths from life failure and
thousands of other liver damage and side effects cases from
1997-2000.
|